National security vs. human rights: A game theoretic analysis of the tension between these objectives

نویسندگان

چکیده

We explore why human rights violations take place in the midst of a rebellion. Authoritarian governments may not care for but surprisingly several democratic have also condoned such violations. show that primary cause is faulty intelligence. There are two type defective intelligence can occur viz., missed alarm and false alarm. consider each these cases determine optimal standard government. then examine effect decrease on probability quelling In our theoretical model, this indeterminate (i.e. be positive or negative). empirically quantify using case Armed Forces Special Powers Act India. Since rebellion directly observable, we use magnitude violence as its indicator. The should negatively related to government’s success. find lowering increases reduces chance rebellion) statistically significant.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

GUARDS: game theoretic security allocation on a national scale

Building on research previously reported at AAMAS conferences, this paper describes an innovative application of a novel gametheoretic approach for a national scale security deployment. Working with the United States Transportation Security Administration (TSA), we have developed a new application called GUARDS to assist in resource allocation tasks for airport protection at over 400 United Sta...

متن کامل

Game Theoretic Analysis of Security and Sustainability

Computational game theory has become a powerful tool to address critical issues in security and sustainability. Casting the security resource allocation problem as a Stackelberg game, novel algorithms have been developed to provide randomized security resource allocations. These algorithms have led to deployed security-game based decision aids for many real-world security domains including infr...

متن کامل

on the relationship between actual vs. perceived difficulties of a text and iranian efl learners reading anxiety

abstract this study examines the relationship between reading anxiety and difficulty of texts as well as the relationship between reading anxiety and students perceived difficulty of the texts. since difficulty is a relative concept, i limited its definition by sticking to the readability formula. we also took students perceived difficulty levels into account. therefore, in the present study, ...

15 صفحه اول

the geopolitics of afghanistan after september 11, 2001, and its impact on iranian national security

abstract u.s. attack to afghanistan after 9/11 provided opportunities for us who tried to become the dominant power after collapse of ussr and bipolar world. thinkers like fukuyama believed american liberal democrats thought would be universally accepted without resistances. liberal democracy is the best and final model of governance; in this regard, united state has moral responsibilities for...

15 صفحه اول

Picking vs. Guessing Secrets: A Game-Theoretic Analysis (Technical Report)

Choosing a hard-to-guess secret is a prerequisite in many security applications. Whether it is a password for user authentication or a secret key for a cryptographic primitive, picking it requires the user to trade-off usability costs with resistance against an adversary: a simple password is easier to remember but is also easier to guess; likewise, a shorter cryptographic key may require fewer...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: European Journal of Operational Research

سال: 2021

ISSN: ['1872-6860', '0377-2217']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.08.017